Disappointment of the year: Montecristo Open Master

In Italy we have a tradition for the last night of the year: throwing away something old from the past year to make room for the things coming in the new year. In keeping with my roots, I started thinking about a symbolic cigar to throw away to salute the end of 2009. Generally I would have problems thinking of a cigar to throw away – even the so so smokes have a time and place in my book – but there is one smoke that stands out for the disappointment I felt smoking it: the Montecristo Open Master. And so, while it is too early to have a top 10 of the year on this Blog,  the Monte Open Master is my “throw in the bin” cigar of the year without doubts.

Habanos launched the Montecristo Open range this year as a line for the occasional outdoors cigar smoker, with both the name and the second green band being a clear reference to golf and the Montecristo Open tournament. Coming in 4 sizes -Eagle (5 7/8 inches by 54), Regata (a belicoso 5 1/3 inches by 46), Master (4 7/8 inches by 50) and Junior (4 1/3 inches by 38)- these have a few potentially exciting things about them: the Master could be Montcristos long-awaited Robusto and the Regata a gentler No.2… The first rumors out there were quite positive, with James Suckling from Cigar aficionado giving the Eagle and the Master respectively 92 and 90 points. What followed wasn’t quite as optimistic with cries of crimes against the quality of cuban cigars.

I got my Master as a freebie from an order I placed through one of the online retailers and this are my notes…

Montecristo Open Series Master

Length: 4 7/8″

Ring gauge: 50

Price: around 13£ in the UK, 9-9.50€ in EU countries

Wrapper: Cuban (looks like shade grown tobacco)

Binder: Cuban

Filler: Cuban

Smoking Time: 60 minutes

Appearance

The wrapper has a nice Connecticut shade hue, but is somewhat veiny. The cigar feels a bit soft, not something really common with Cubans in my experience. Pre-light there are very few flavours to pick up, jus some tobacco and hay. The draw is somewhat loose, again untypical for a Cuban.

Smoke

No real sense in splitting this cigar in the classic three sections as there is little if any evolution to speak of. The burn throughout is almost perfect and the cigar produces a good amount of smoke. The ash, on the other hand, is quite flaky and light gray and doesn’t stay on for very long. What about the taste?

Taste you say? I guess they must have left that in Cuba because there’s very little of that. It starts with mild tobacco notes and a little coffee, slowly becoming a bit creamy and woody and finishing on cedar and very light sweet spice notes.

Worth it?

To be honest, this is not the worst cigar I have smoked this year (it gets a 75 in my book), but compared to my expectations it certainly is the one that fell furthest away. It is a decent mild smoke, but there are tons of mild smokes -both Cuban and non- that kick this stogie’s but flavorwise. What the Open Master really misses is the Cuban character and there are definitely better mild Cubans out there (Por Larrañaga and Fonseca, just to name two) which cost will not be as heavy on your pocket. A few aficionados out there (Cigar Inspector and Yorgos and cigar.ie, for example) make the point that this is not for the seasoned smoker or the cigar aficionado, but rather the casual smoker. While I take the point, it still is an overpriced and flavorless stick and I am happy to give it the boot!

For some more Open Master “love” you might also want to have a look at this great Friends of Habanos video, which I couldn’t agree more with:

Advertisements

8 responses to “Disappointment of the year: Montecristo Open Master

  1. I also called it “disappointment of the year” in my top Cuban cigars of 2009 list:
    http://www.cigarinspector.com/other/top-cuban-cigars-of-2009

    I recently gave a second chance to a Montecristo Open Regata and it was no better 😦

  2. Love the BOTLs Blogging brotherhood. I am soon going to join the club!!!

  3. Pingback: Partagas Serie D No.4, ECCJ and a knee-jerk review « Cigar Review Rag

  4. MT – nice review. I haven’t had the Master myself, but found the Regata to be a huge disappointment. I’m going to have to try one again because I couldn’t even finish the last…

    • Hi Simon, thanks for the comment and nice new blog you’ve got there!

      Regarding the Open, I must admit I am tempted to try another as well, maybe the Junior, given the continuous good reviews these are getting in the press, but on the other hand I have to think… why bother? There’s so much more interesting stuff to try out there!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s